Herbal Medicine Vs. Allopathic Medicine - by Anita Burns
I want to start out by first stating that I am not anti-modern medicine. I have great faith in our modern medical system for most things. If I were to break a bone, or require emergency surgery, I wouldn’t want to stick strictly to herbal medicine. I believe that both systems have a right and good place in healing.
For
centuries Europeans and Asians viewed disease as a dysfunction of the
whole body, or a whole system. Cures were aimed at bringing the body
back into balance so that it could heal itself.
Although
traditional thought on disease also included superstition, ignorance of
anatomy, and in some places unhealthy beliefs about hygiene, much that
was useful about medicine was known and practiced.
In
both East and West, disease was often cured with plants that were
either proven or intuited to have an effect on a particular system in
the body that was injured or unbalanced. In Europe, the "Five Humors"
theory was developed. In the near east, the "Three Dosha Ayurvedic"
system was the basis of medicine. In the Far East, the "Five Elements"
theory was practiced.
Superstition
about demons, curses, and in Europe, lack of basic knowledge of hygiene
aside, these systems were mostly effective. In the opinion of some
alternative health researchers today, they were as effective as modern
allopathic method for many diseases.
Not
much is known about medical practices of Africa (except for ancient
Egypt), and the ancient Americas, but they too, used herbs and plants,
along with surgery and other medical techniques.
In
the last two centuries, there has been a rise in the "scientific
method,” a way of investigating and "proving,” in the Newtonian sense,
whether a substance really works as a medicinal or not and in what way.
In
the western world, especially North America, allopathic medicine took
root and holistic medicine, viewed as old fashioned and unscientific,
was pushed more and more into the background. In Europe and Asia, with
centuries more behind them of holistic practices, both schools of
though and medicine practices are accepted and sometimes integrated.
However, in the United States, allopathic medicine has taken hold and
has tried—and is still trying—to stamp out any other form of health
care.
Allopathic medicine promotes
the belief that most disease is caused by a pathogen invading the body
and that an anti-pathogen can destroy the invader to heal the body.
Although great strides have been made in the cure of many diseases,
often the allopathic medicines create side effects almost as disastrous
as the disease itself.
With the
possible exception of cancer and aids, we are no longer in a disease
crisis in the United States as we were when smallpox, polio, fatal
influenza, TB, and more were rampant. However, we are in a health
crisis. By ignoring the whole body in favor of allopathic specificity,
we have swung the pendulum too far to one side.
Health
is not just the absence of disease. It is vitality, energy, clear
thought, immunity, and strength. How we treat our minds and bodies has
an effect on health. We are ultimately responsible for the health and
well being of our bodies. However, somewhere along the way, we seemed
to have abandoned that belief.
We
have adopted a code that says we put the responsibility for health in
the hands of a select few who have legal and actual power over our life
and death. Unfortunately, even Medical Doctors (MDs) have been caught
in their own trap. For an MD to recommend any form of holistic
medicine—acupressure, chiropractic, herbs, homeopathies, and such, is
often to risk their reputation and their future as licensed doctors
that they worked so long and hard to achieve.
The
public has made this worse by relinquishing any responsibility for
their own care and well being. If a doctor recommends herbs or another
form of card and the patient isn’t cured, he/she can sue the doctor.
Doctors live in constant dread of malpractice lawsuits, which is one
factor in the high cost of malpractice insurance that runs up the cost
of medical care.
Granted, there are
tons of MDs who are so incompetent that they deserve the lawsuits but many
are simply doing what they can in an atmosphere of a sue-happy public.
They trap works both ways. Laws in the United States often take away
our right to choose health care and force us into the form of health
care that has gained the most power through government lobbying and
economic considerations. This led to a massive public outcry in 1993
that resulted in some concessions by the government to allow more
freedom of choice where over the counter herbs are concerned.
Nevertheless, it really did very little to open the field in an
equitable way.
An herbalist in the
United States cannot legally diagnose nor prescribe an herb for
anything, even as simple as white willow bark for a headache. Nor can
an herbalist suggest that you take an aspirin.
Herbalism
is a system that takes into account pathogens, whole body balance, body
chemistry, tradition, and scientific proof of the herb’s effectiveness
in treating disease. In many places in Europe, herbalism is an accepted
health care choice, as is naturopathy, homeopathy, and aromatherapy. In
the United States, the FDA is gaining more and more power to tell us
what we need to do for our well being, and what we can’t do.
Originally,
health regulation was intended to protect us from charlatans pushing
"snake oil cures” and bogus cancer cures. But, when economics entered
the picture, Pandora’s box was opened. In 1993, the spark that flamed
the public outcry was a proposed regulation that would require all
herbs and vitamins to be dispensed only through prescription by
licensed physicians. It would have made it a crime to take vitamin C or
by garlic capsules without a prescription from a doctor. The prices for
herbs and vitamins would probably have soared and we would have been
cut off from one more avenue of health care.
Even with the current trend in insurance companies covering or offering discounted alternative health care services, we must not relax. WE must take back our right to have dominion over our own bodies and have the right to choose our health care. If regulation of herbs comes in the way, the FDA has made it clear it wants it to, herbal companies will be forced to spend millions of dollars in testing for each herb before the FDA would approve their use as a medicinal. Previous testings or centuries of proven efficacy in use would not be accepted.
Herbal
companies would then have to recoup their expenditures by increasing
their prices. Imagine spending $80 for a bottle of Milk Thistle
tincture instead of $5-$12. In addition, many useful herbs would simply
disappear because they are too easy to obtain cheaply in the wild (like
milk thistle) or can be homegrown. Herbal companies couldn’t risk not
recouping their losses and would likely drop them from their inventory.
Herbalism
has a long history. We don’t know when humans first decided and
discovered that some plants did more than nourish the body by feeding
the belly. Perhaps it was by watching what some animals did when
feeling ill, or by "divine intervention.” We don’t know.
However,
as far back as we have written evidence of medical practices, we have
reports of herbs and plants successfully used as medicine. Garlic may
be the oldest known medicinal plant. Garlic cloves have been found in
caves inhabited 10,000 years ago. A prescription for garlic was found
on a Sumerian clay tablet from 3000 B.C. Chinese doctors mentioned
Cinnamon as a medicinal as far back as 2700 B.C. Since then, there has
been a lot of scientific testing on herbs including testing by the
United States government.
Herbalism
works closely with the body’s own immune system. You may be surprised
to learn that the American Medical Association (AMA) has only recently
recognized the body’s immune system at al in relation to health. It has
also come as a recent surprise to the AMA that nutrition, exercise, and
mental/emotional attitudes affect health.
Preventing ill health and disease has been a longstanding tradition among holistic health practices but has arrived as a new and innovative—if somewhat suspicious—concept to modern U.S. allopathic physicians.
It is finally coming to light (again) that we can only defeat illness by paying more attention to health and less attention to treating disease. However, there is also a trend for some MDs and some lay people to want herbs to act as a lateral substitute for allopathic medicines—to treat pathogens and ignore the rest of health. In other words, they are trying to pound a square peg into a round hole.
With herbs, the whole system must be taken into account and they generally do not work quickly and miraculously to erase symptoms as do many allopathic medicines. Most herbs work more slowly, and in combination with other herbs, to help the body regain health on its own. Sometimes this comes quickly, sometimes slowly, but true health is regained, not just a suppression of symptoms without examining lifestyle and emotional causative factors.
In a "natural supplement” retail where I once worked, we had customers who made the same mistake. They would come in and ask me "What do you have for energy?” They may work 14 hours a day, take care of a family and spouse, sleep four hours a night, eat mostly caffeine, fat, and sugar but they wan the magical pill that will eliminate fatigue. A suggestion of seeing a physician for a check up, proper diet, and rest as a possible relief from fatigue would be rejected and they would buy a bottle of Guarana. Guarana a natural source for strong caffeine. It can be useful for a burst of energy but if proper rest and nutrition are ignored, the body can be depleted even further possibly resulting in more serious health problems.
Herbs are not drugs. However, by their complex structures, medicinal foods (herbs) create many of the same benefits as drugs—mostly without unpleasant side effects.
For example, in a Nutrilite press release dated January 7, 2000, researchers conducted a six-month study of lutein. In the study, "blood levels of lutein increased by 28% in 21 participants, closely matching levels found in individuals who consume lutein-rich diets incorporating yellow and green fruits and vegetables. The rise was small but still significant. Researchers believe this may lower the risk of developing age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a condition that affects roughly 1.7 million people over the age of 65.”
There
have been numerous studies on garlic’s power to lower cholesterol in
contrast to prescription drugs such as cholestyramine. Garlic has been
proven to lower cholesterol and any herbalist worth his/her salt would
combine garlic with other supporting herbs for a cholesterol lowering
formula. But because cholestyramine is economically a money maker and
garlic is not, pharmaceutical companies are not going to recommend that
doctors prescribe garlic. Doctors who do—assuming they are aware of
garlic’s ability in that area—risk ridicule and expulsion from
membership in professional organizations such as the AMA.
How to get proof that herbs work as they are reputed to work and how to separate unfounded folklore and placebo from actual medicinal uses of plants is a problem. However, it is less so thanks to the open mindedness of many new researchers in the world. Studies done in France, Germany, China, England, and more abound. Much folklore about herbs has proven true, but much as also been discovered to be false. For example, boneset—eupatorium perfolatum—may sound like an herb to heal bones and some folklore prescribes it for that but it’s name comes from a traditional use as a cure for breakbone fever. It has proven to be useful in treating minor viral and bacterial infections by stimulating the white blood cells into action.
Folklore prescribes juniper for sexually transmitted diseases such as gonorrhea. However, scientific testing shows it to be ineffective. Juniper does act as a diuretic and is included in an over-the-counter PMS medicine. It is effective as a part of an overall treatment for high blood pressure and congestive heart failure. High doses, over a long period of time can irritate the kidneys.
Be cautious of herbal books that do not take modern findings about the nature and action of herbs into account. Some recommended authors are Michael Castleman, Daniel B. Bowrey, Leslie & Michael Tierra, and David Hoffman.
Keep in mind that you are ultimately responsible for your health. No herb will make you healthy as long as you engage in unhealthy lifestyle habits such as eating a diet containing mostly foods devoid of proper nutrition, smoking, lack of exercise, and emotional stress. Herbs counteract pathogens and help your body heal itself but are not an excuse to engage in a disastrous, indulgent lifestyle.